Review



nir video fear conditioning package for mouse  (Med Associates Inc)


Bioz Verified Symbol Med Associates Inc is a verified supplier
Bioz Manufacturer Symbol Med Associates Inc manufactures this product  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 96

    Structured Review

    Med Associates Inc nir video fear conditioning package for mouse
    Nir Video Fear Conditioning Package For Mouse, supplied by Med Associates Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 114 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/nir video fear conditioning package for mouse/product/Med Associates Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 114 article reviews
    nir video fear conditioning package for mouse - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    96/100 stars

    Images



    Similar Products

    96
    Med Associates Inc nir video fear conditioning package for mouse
    Nir Video Fear Conditioning Package For Mouse, supplied by Med Associates Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/nir video fear conditioning package for mouse/product/Med Associates Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    nir video fear conditioning package for mouse - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    96
    Med Associates Inc nir video fear conditioning optogenetics package for mouse
    VTA neurons, and amongst them dopamine neurons, respond to footshocks and acquire CS - responsiveness. ( A ) Schematic showing an optrode with 16 recording channels implanted in the VTA of a DAT Cre × ChR2-eYFP mouse. ( B ) Post-hoc histological image showing the placement of an optrode (dashed line) in the VTA in the example mouse of panels B – H (FT7612). The tracks of two tetrodes are visible (arrows). Bottom, scheme of the design of four tetrodes (T1 - T4) around the optical fiber. ( C ) Illustration of <t>optogenetic</t> identification of putative DAT + units. Raster plot for four electrodes (E1-E4) of one tetrode, showing unsorted spikes aligned to the onsets of n = 100, 2 ms – long laser light pulses (blue shading). Spikes at 2-8 ms after the light pulse were collected and subjected to spike clustering (see Materials and Methods). ( D ) Time course of freezing of the example mouse during the three days of the fear learning protocol. ( E ) Spiking activity of a single opto-tagged putative DAT + unit during day 2 (training day). AP frequency (top) and z-score (bottom) are shown in response to the CS (averages over the n = 30 tone presentations for each tone block), as well as in response to footshocks (averages over the n = 6 footshock presentations; right). ( F ) Spiking activity of the same unit as (E), but for responses to CS presentations on day 3 (threat memory retrieval). Right, AP-waveforms for the unit shown in E, F. ( G, H ) Responses of all units in this mouse (FT7612) to tone presentations during day1 - day 3 (G), and to footshocks on day 2 (H). Z-scores were analyzed and plotted as a function of time (number of tone block). Units classified as CS - entrained are shown in pink, and the others in gray. Thick red and black lines show average ± S.E.M. across these groups, respectively. Square symbols connected by lines represent DAT + units identified by optotagging. ( I, J, K ) Venn-type diagrams showing the number of units in the different response classes and their overlap. The data in (I) is from the example mouse shown in panels B-H. Note the overall similar distribution and overlap of response types across n = 3 mice. Two US responsive units in mouse FT6963 showed a reduction in firing upon the footshock (J, dashed areas).
    Nir Video Fear Conditioning Optogenetics Package For Mouse, supplied by Med Associates Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/nir video fear conditioning optogenetics package for mouse/product/Med Associates Inc
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    nir video fear conditioning optogenetics package for mouse - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    VTA neurons, and amongst them dopamine neurons, respond to footshocks and acquire CS - responsiveness. ( A ) Schematic showing an optrode with 16 recording channels implanted in the VTA of a DAT Cre × ChR2-eYFP mouse. ( B ) Post-hoc histological image showing the placement of an optrode (dashed line) in the VTA in the example mouse of panels B – H (FT7612). The tracks of two tetrodes are visible (arrows). Bottom, scheme of the design of four tetrodes (T1 - T4) around the optical fiber. ( C ) Illustration of optogenetic identification of putative DAT + units. Raster plot for four electrodes (E1-E4) of one tetrode, showing unsorted spikes aligned to the onsets of n = 100, 2 ms – long laser light pulses (blue shading). Spikes at 2-8 ms after the light pulse were collected and subjected to spike clustering (see Materials and Methods). ( D ) Time course of freezing of the example mouse during the three days of the fear learning protocol. ( E ) Spiking activity of a single opto-tagged putative DAT + unit during day 2 (training day). AP frequency (top) and z-score (bottom) are shown in response to the CS (averages over the n = 30 tone presentations for each tone block), as well as in response to footshocks (averages over the n = 6 footshock presentations; right). ( F ) Spiking activity of the same unit as (E), but for responses to CS presentations on day 3 (threat memory retrieval). Right, AP-waveforms for the unit shown in E, F. ( G, H ) Responses of all units in this mouse (FT7612) to tone presentations during day1 - day 3 (G), and to footshocks on day 2 (H). Z-scores were analyzed and plotted as a function of time (number of tone block). Units classified as CS - entrained are shown in pink, and the others in gray. Thick red and black lines show average ± S.E.M. across these groups, respectively. Square symbols connected by lines represent DAT + units identified by optotagging. ( I, J, K ) Venn-type diagrams showing the number of units in the different response classes and their overlap. The data in (I) is from the example mouse shown in panels B-H. Note the overall similar distribution and overlap of response types across n = 3 mice. Two US responsive units in mouse FT6963 showed a reduction in firing upon the footshock (J, dashed areas).

    Journal: bioRxiv

    Article Title: Dopamine in the basal amygdala signals salient somatosensory events during fear learning

    doi: 10.1101/716589

    Figure Lengend Snippet: VTA neurons, and amongst them dopamine neurons, respond to footshocks and acquire CS - responsiveness. ( A ) Schematic showing an optrode with 16 recording channels implanted in the VTA of a DAT Cre × ChR2-eYFP mouse. ( B ) Post-hoc histological image showing the placement of an optrode (dashed line) in the VTA in the example mouse of panels B – H (FT7612). The tracks of two tetrodes are visible (arrows). Bottom, scheme of the design of four tetrodes (T1 - T4) around the optical fiber. ( C ) Illustration of optogenetic identification of putative DAT + units. Raster plot for four electrodes (E1-E4) of one tetrode, showing unsorted spikes aligned to the onsets of n = 100, 2 ms – long laser light pulses (blue shading). Spikes at 2-8 ms after the light pulse were collected and subjected to spike clustering (see Materials and Methods). ( D ) Time course of freezing of the example mouse during the three days of the fear learning protocol. ( E ) Spiking activity of a single opto-tagged putative DAT + unit during day 2 (training day). AP frequency (top) and z-score (bottom) are shown in response to the CS (averages over the n = 30 tone presentations for each tone block), as well as in response to footshocks (averages over the n = 6 footshock presentations; right). ( F ) Spiking activity of the same unit as (E), but for responses to CS presentations on day 3 (threat memory retrieval). Right, AP-waveforms for the unit shown in E, F. ( G, H ) Responses of all units in this mouse (FT7612) to tone presentations during day1 - day 3 (G), and to footshocks on day 2 (H). Z-scores were analyzed and plotted as a function of time (number of tone block). Units classified as CS - entrained are shown in pink, and the others in gray. Thick red and black lines show average ± S.E.M. across these groups, respectively. Square symbols connected by lines represent DAT + units identified by optotagging. ( I, J, K ) Venn-type diagrams showing the number of units in the different response classes and their overlap. The data in (I) is from the example mouse shown in panels B-H. Note the overall similar distribution and overlap of response types across n = 3 mice. Two US responsive units in mouse FT6963 showed a reduction in firing upon the footshock (J, dashed areas).

    Article Snippet: A classical auditory cued threat memory paradigm was performed in a conditioning chamber of a NIR Video Fear Conditioning Optogenetics Package for Mouse (MED-VFC-OPTO-M, Med Associates Inc., VT, USA).

    Techniques: Activity Assay, Blocking Assay